Private and Public Spheres
Fiche de révision anglais Terminale sur l'espace privé et l'espace public : surveillance, réseaux sociaux, vie privée et libertés individuelles dans les pays anglophones.
Programme officiel
Axe 2 — Ce thème explore la frontière entre vie privée et vie publique, à l'ère numérique et dans les sociétés anglophones.
Cours complet
I. The Right to Privacy
Privacy is considered a fundamental right in democracies. The 4th Amendment to the US Constitution protects against unreasonable searches. The UK's Human Rights Act (Article 8) guarantees respect for private life. However, the digital age has blurred boundaries: cookies track browsing habits, smartphones record locations, and data brokers sell personal information. The Cambridge Analytica scandal (2018) showed how personal data from 87 million Facebook users was harvested for political advertising, raising urgent questions about digital privacy.
II. Surveillance Society
George Orwell's "1984" (Big Brother) has become a cultural reference for state surveillance. The UK has more CCTV cameras per capita than almost any country. After 9/11, the US Patriot Act expanded government surveillance powers. Edward Snowden's revelations (2013) exposed mass surveillance by the NSA, sparking a global debate. China's Social Credit System represents the most extreme modern surveillance model. The tension: security vs. freedom — does surveillance make us safer or less free?
III. Social Media: Public Lives, Private Struggles
Social media has fundamentally changed the boundary between public and private. People voluntarily share intimate details online, yet face consequences: cyberbullying, cancel culture, doxxing. The "right to be forgotten" (EU law) allows individuals to request removal of personal data. Influencer culture blurs authenticity and performance. Mental health impacts are significant: studies link heavy social media use to anxiety, depression, and body image issues, especially among teenagers.
IV. Whistleblowing and Transparency
Whistleblowers like Edward Snowden, Chelsea Manning, and Julian Assange challenge the boundary between state secrecy and public interest. Are they heroes protecting democracy or traitors endangering national security? The debate reveals tensions between transparency and security. Journalistic freedom and press protection (the Pentagon Papers, Watergate) are cornerstones of democratic accountability.
Key Vocabulary
Méthode bac
Pour analyser un document sur ce thème, identifiez d'abord la position de l'auteur (pro-privacy ou pro-security), puis les arguments et exemples utilisés. Pensez à nuancer votre essai : les deux camps ont des arguments valides. Utilisez des références culturelles (1984, Black Mirror) pour enrichir votre argumentation.
Sujets type bac
"In the digital age, privacy is dead." Do you agree?
Should governments have the right to monitor citizens' online activity?
Exercices d'entraînement
Q1 : "Nothing to hide, nothing to fear." Discuss this argument about surveillance.
Answer: This argument assumes that only guilty people need privacy, but it is flawed. Privacy protects: freedom of thought and expression, political dissent, personal autonomy. Even innocent people are harmed by surveillance (chilling effect on free speech, false positives). As Edward Snowden said: "Arguing that you don't care about privacy because you have nothing to hide is like arguing you don't care about free speech because you have nothing to say."
Q2 : How has social media changed the public/private boundary?
Answer: Social media encourages sharing private information publicly: personal photos, opinions, locations, relationships. This creates a "performance of self" where people curate idealised versions of their lives. Consequences include loss of privacy (employers check profiles), cyberbullying, and mental health issues. Yet social media also democratises public discourse, giving voice to marginalised groups (#MeToo, #BLM).
Q3 : Is Edward Snowden a hero or a traitor? Justify your position.
Answer: Hero argument: Snowden exposed illegal mass surveillance by the NSA, informing citizens and sparking democratic debate. He sacrificed his freedom for the public good. Traitor argument: he broke the law, endangered intelligence operations, and fled to Russia. Nuanced view: his actions were illegal but served the public interest — the debate itself proves the value of his revelations.
Q4 : Compare surveillance in Orwell's 1984 and in modern society.
Answer: In 1984, the totalitarian state imposes surveillance through telescreens — citizens have no choice. In modern society, much surveillance is voluntary (smartphones, social media, smart speakers). Both involve constant monitoring, but modern surveillance is more subtle and commercially driven. The difference: Orwell's dystopia used surveillance for political control; today's surveillance serves both security and profit.
Q5 : Should there be a "right to be forgotten" online?
Answer: Arguments for: people change, past mistakes should not define them forever, especially minors; outdated information can be harmful and misleading. Arguments against: it can be used to censor legitimate information; it conflicts with freedom of information and historical record. Balance: the right should exist for private individuals but be limited for public figures and matters of public interest.
À retenir pour le bac
- •Privacy — notion clé à maîtriser pour cet axe.
- •Surveillance — notion clé à maîtriser pour cet axe.
- •Social media — notion clé à maîtriser pour cet axe.
- •Freedom of speech — notion clé à maîtriser pour cet axe.
- •Whistleblowing — notion clé à maîtriser pour cet axe.
Autres fiches d'anglais Terminale
Fiche complète sur le thème Identités et échanges en anglais Terminale : mondialisation, multiculturalisme, migrations et identité culturelle dans le monde anglophone.
Art and PowerFiche anglais Terminale sur Art et pouvoir : comment l'art conteste, soutient ou subvertit le pouvoir politique dans le monde anglophone — street art, musique, littérature engagée.
Citizenship and Virtual WorldsFiche de révision anglais Terminale sur citoyenneté et mondes virtuels : activisme en ligne, démocratie numérique, fake news et identité digitale.
Citizenship and Virtual WorldsFiche de révision anglais Terminale sur citoyenneté et mondes virtuels : activisme en ligne, démocratie numérique, fake news, intelligence artificielle et identité digitale.
Fictions and RealitiesFiche anglais Terminale sur Fictions et réalités : littérature dystopique, cinéma, séries TV, réalité virtuelle et frontière entre fiction et vérité dans le monde anglophone.
